Topic summary
⁠12%1 analyzed article/video820 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Resident Needs results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Appeal to Emotion, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 6.5% saturation with 214 hits. Analysis detected 1,122 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,280 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠19% (18,774 of 23,050 topics). This Resident Needs is better (less manipulative) than 81.40% of the peer group.
Resident Needs
Topic details
Total words: 3,280
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

19% percentile
025507510018.6% percentile
1.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.2%1.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 0.3%0.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.0%3.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.9%0.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.6%0.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.6%0.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.5%1.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.9%2.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.8%0.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.7%1.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.4%Composition/Division: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos