Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,034 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Republican Convention results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and In-Group Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 6.8% saturation with 283 hits. Analysis detected 2,637 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,136 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠18% (13,669 of 16,562 topics). This Republican Convention is better (less manipulative) than 82.50% of the peer group.
Republican Convention
Topic details
Total words: 4,136
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

18% percentile
025507510017.5% percentile
1.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.8%6.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.3%3.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.2%5.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.8%0.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.0%3.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.4%1.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.5%0.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.2%1.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 4.1%4.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.9%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%False Dilemma: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.8%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos