Topic summary
27% 3 analyzed articles/videos 4,834 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rental Market results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Anecdotal , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.1% saturation with 1,853 hits . Analysis detected 12,338 faulty-reasoning hits from 18,294 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 8% (14,559 of 15,769 topics). This Rental Market is better (less manipulative) than 92.30% of the peer group. Rental Market
Topic details
Total words: 18,294
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
8% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 7.7% percentile 1.5% BS Score3 analyzed articles18.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 10.1% 10.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 7.7% 7.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.1% 2.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 5.8% 5.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.1% 3.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.8% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst