Topic summary
27%3 analyzed articles/videos4,834 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rental Market results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Anecdotal, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.1% saturation with 1,853 hits. Analysis detected 12,338 faulty-reasoning hits from 18,294 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 8% (14,559 of 15,769 topics). This Rental Market is better (less manipulative) than 92.30% of the peer group.
Rental Market
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 18,294
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

8% percentile
02550751007.7% percentile
1.5% BS Score3 analyzed articles18.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 10.1%10.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.0%2.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.7%7.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.2%1.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.8%5.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.1%3.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.7%1.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.8%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate