Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Rent Relief results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Slippery Slope, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 10.8% saturation with 384 hits. Analysis detected 3,019 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,568 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Rent Relief is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Rent Relief
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,568
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.0%8.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.8%4.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.6%3.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.9%0.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.8%1.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 10.8%10.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.8%0.8%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Topic 6.0%6.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 1.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 3.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 0.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 2.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.2%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.5%Recency Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Burden of Proof: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos