Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Renewable Energy Solutions results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, False Dilemma, and Appeal to Authority, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9.8% saturation with 420 hits. Analysis detected 4,159 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,268 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Renewable Energy Solutions is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Renewable Energy Solutions
Topic details
Total words: 4,268
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.8%9.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.7%2.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.8%1.8%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 8.7%8.7%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 8.3%8.3%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 5.9%5.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.6%6.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.2%4.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.4%5.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.1%4.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 9.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 0.5%False Dilemma: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 1.5%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 6.0%Indoctrination: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 0.0%Anecdotal: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.8%Bandwagon: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos