Topic summary
46%3 analyzed articles/videos545 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Renewable Energy Integration results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Framing Effect, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 19.1% saturation with 964 hits. Analysis detected 3,624 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,040 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 44% (9,374 of 16,562 topics). This Renewable Energy Integration is better (less manipulative) than 56.60% of the peer group.
Renewable Energy Integration
Topic details
Total words: 5,040
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

43% percentile
025507510043.4% percentile
2.7% BS Score3 analyzed articles5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.2%5.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 0.3%0.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.9%0.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 19.1%19.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.7%0.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.8%1.8%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 7.9%7.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.8%6.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.2%4.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.5%1.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 19.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 19.1%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 8.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 3.7%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 0.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate