Topic summary
46% 3 analyzed articles/videos 545 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Renewable Energy Integration results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Framing Effect , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 19.1% saturation with 964 hits . Analysis detected 3,624 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,040 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 44% (9,374 of 16,562 topics). This Renewable Energy Integration is better (less manipulative) than 56.60% of the peer group. Renewable Energy Integration
Topic details
Total words: 5,040
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
43% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 43.4% percentile 2.7% BS Score3 analyzed articles5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 5.2% 5.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 19.1% 19.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Topic 7.9% 7.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 6.8% 6.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 4.2% 4.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 19.2% Optimism Bias: Topic 19.1%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 8.1% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 3.7% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.0% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 0.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.5% Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst