Topic summary
⁠46%1 analyzed article/video798 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Renaming Debates results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Self-Serving Bias, and In-Group Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.6% saturation with 277 hits. Analysis detected 1,763 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,394 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠55% (7,464 of 16,351 topics). This Renaming Debates is worse (more manipulative) than 54.40% of the peer group.
Renaming Debates
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,394
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

54% percentile
025507510054.4% percentile
3.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.0%4.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 11.6%11.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.4%0.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.1%4.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 10.9%10.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.0%4.0%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 6.4%6.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 4.7%4.7%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Topic 1.0%1.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 11.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 10.9%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 6.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 3.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 5.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.7%Straw Man: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.1%Burden of Proof: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos