Topic summary
86%1 analyzed article/video684 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Religious Advocacy results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Framing Effect, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 33.2% saturation with 682 hits. Analysis detected 2,114 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,052 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.5% and a BS Rank of 73% (4,617 of 16,562 topics). This Religious Advocacy is worse (more manipulative) than 72.10% of the peer group.
Religious Advocacy
Topic details
Total words: 2,052
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

72% percentile
025507510072.1% percentile
4.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.7%8.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 33.2%33.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.1%7.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.3%1.3%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 5.6%5.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 7.0%7.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.7%0.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 3.2%3.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.2%4.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 33.2%, sitewide 15.9%Framing Effect: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 12.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 7.5%False Dilemma: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 1.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.0%Indoctrination: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 0.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 5.2%Bandwagon: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.8%Special Pleading: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos