Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Religion In Sports results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Politically Right Leaning Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 24.1% saturation with 540 hits. Analysis detected 3,586 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,240 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Religion In Sports is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Religion In Sports
Topic details
Total words: 2,240
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 24.1%24.1%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 13.5%13.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 16.7%16.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.5%7.5%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 7.7%7.7%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 9.7%9.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 12.4%12.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%Tu QuoqueSitewide 0.2%Topic 6.5%6.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 16.7%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 24.1%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 12.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 15.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 13.5%, sitewide 1.4%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 11.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 2.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 8.1%Indoctrination: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 0.0%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 6.7%Tu Quoque: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 0.2%Anecdotal: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.7%False Dilemma: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos