Topic summary
ā 0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Religion In Politics results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Halo Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 17.8% saturation with 341 hits. Analysis detected 2,065 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,912 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ā 0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Religion In Politics is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Religion In Politics
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
ā 0%Uber1%
ā 0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
ā 0%Opera1%
ā 0%Holocaust1%
ā 0%Privacy Policy1%
ā 100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
ā 100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
ā 100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
ā 0%Religion In Politics (selected)0%
Topic details
Total words: 1,912
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0ā€“50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.0%5.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.5%1.5%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 8.6%8.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.1%1.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.9%0.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 12.4%12.4%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 1.1%1.1%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 2.9%2.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 17.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 12.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 6.7%Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 9.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 3.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 6.0%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.1%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Straw Man: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos