Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,136 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Religion And Women's Health results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Anecdotal, and Confirmation Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 27.1% saturation with 925 hits. Analysis detected 7,445 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,408 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠86% (2,454 of 16,562 topics). This Religion And Women's Health is worse (more manipulative) than 85.20% of the peer group.
Religion And Women's Health
Topic details
Total words: 3,408
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

85% percentile
025507510085.2% percentile
6.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 21.4%21.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 18.1%18.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 13.0%13.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 17.0%17.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.8%6.8%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Topic 8.0%8.0%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 7.6%7.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 13.5%13.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.8%5.8%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Topic 6.4%6.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 27.1%, sitewide 26.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 21.4%, sitewide 6.0%Negativity Bias: Topic 13.5%, sitewide 19.2%Anecdotal: Topic 18.1%, sitewide 5.2%Confirmation Bias: Topic 17.0%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 15.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 13.0%, sitewide 3.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 12.1%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 9.1%Slippery Slope: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 1.7%Halo Effect: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 6.7%False Dilemma: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 1.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 6.9%Loss Aversion: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 1.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 3.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 4.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos