Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Reign Of Fire results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Halo Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 17.1% saturation with 614 hits. Analysis detected 3,928 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,582 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,558 topics). This Reign Of Fire is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Reign Of Fire
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,582
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.9%2.9%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 17.1%17.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.0%6.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 16.7%16.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.3%6.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.3%3.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.9%1.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.7%3.7%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 5.8%5.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 19.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 17.1%, sitewide 0.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 16.7%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 6.0%False Dilemma: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 1.5%Anecdotal: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 4.6%Bandwagon: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 2.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos