Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video825 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Regulatory Decisions results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 30.9% saturation with 764 hits. Analysis detected 3,859 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,475 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠75% (4,152 of 16,562 topics). This Regulatory Decisions is worse (more manipulative) than 74.90% of the peer group.
Regulatory Decisions
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠75%Regulatory Decisions (selected)5%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 2,475
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

75% percentile
025507510074.9% percentile
4.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 16.1%16.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.0%9.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 9.7%9.7%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Topic 6.6%6.6%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Topic 8.0%8.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.1%0.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.5%2.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 5.0%5.0%Red HerringSitewide 0.7%Topic 4.8%4.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 30.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 19.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 16.1%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 8.1%Loss Aversion: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 2.5%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 6.0%Straw Man: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 0.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 5.0%, sitewide 0.8%Red Herring: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 0.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 2.0%Special Pleading: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 0.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos