Topic summary
⁠62%1 analyzed article/video838 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Regulatory Battles results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Hasty Generalization, and Negativity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 15.7% saturation with 527 hits. Analysis detected 2,600 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,352 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠61% (9,361 of 23,499 topics). This Regulatory Battles is worse (more manipulative) than 60.20% of the peer group.
Regulatory Battles
Topic details
Total words: 3,352
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

60% percentile
025507510060.2% percentile
2.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 11.8%11.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.9%0.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.8%5.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 15.7%15.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.4%0.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.8%3.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.5%1.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.9%0.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.8%3.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 11.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 15.7%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 2.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.0%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos