Topic summary
⁠44%1 analyzed article/video1,324 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Regulacion Empresarial results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Negativity Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 10.8% saturation with 572 hits. Analysis detected 4,147 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,296 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠45% (9,248 of 16,562 topics). This Regulacion Empresarial is better (less manipulative) than 55.80% of the peer group.
Regulacion Empresarial
Topic details
Total words: 5,296
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

44% percentile
025507510044.2% percentile
2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.7%4.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.9%8.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.3%3.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.0%1.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.8%0.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 10.8%10.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.8%1.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 7.2%7.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 7.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 7.2%, sitewide 3.3%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 5.3%Slippery Slope: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 1.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Begging the Question: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos