Topic summary
82% 1 analyzed article/video 457 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Regional Order results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Confirmation Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 30.9% saturation with 565 hits . Analysis detected 2,725 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,828 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.2% and a BS Rank of 83% (2,841 of 16,562 topics). This Regional Order is worse (more manipulative) than 82.90% of the peer group. Regional Order
Topic details
Total words: 1,828
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
83% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 82.9% percentile 6.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 30.9% 30.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 5.0% 5.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 21.0% 21.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Topic 6.7% 6.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Topic 5.3% 5.3% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 30.9%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Topic 25.9%, sitewide 26.9% Confirmation Bias: Topic 21.0%, sitewide 7.5% Negativity Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 9.1% Optimism Bias: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 6.0% Halo Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 6.7%, sitewide 0.8% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.5%, sitewide 3.3% Hindsight Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 1.4% Anecdotal: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% False Dilemma: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.9% Recency Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Circular Reasoning: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.1% Indoctrination: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.0% Composition/Division: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.2% Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.6% Red Herring: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst