Topic summary
⁠78%5 analyzed articles/videos3,322 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Regional Cooperation results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Self-Serving Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 10.5% saturation with 1,158 hits. Analysis detected 8,706 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,052 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of ⁠24% (11,835 of 15,447 topics). This Regional Cooperation is better (less manipulative) than 76.60% of the peer group.
Regional Cooperation
Topic details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

23% percentile
025507510023.4% percentile
2.0% BS Score5 analyzed articles11.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 10.3%10.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.8%1.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.7%5.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.8%0.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.1%2.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 10.5%10.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.6%2.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 10.5%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos