Topic summary
⁠28%1 analyzed article/video1,997 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Reforestation Challenges results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Biased Writer Voice, and Pessimism Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.4% saturation with 864 hits. Analysis detected 2,609 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,991 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠11% (14,767 of 16,562 topics). This Reforestation Challenges is better (less manipulative) than 89.20% of the peer group.
Reforestation Challenges
Topic details
Total words: 5,991
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

11% percentile
025507510010.8% percentile
1.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.3%1.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.0%4.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.9%0.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.2%0.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.0%1.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 14.4%14.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.5%0.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 14.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.3%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.8%Red Herring: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos