Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Reflecting Pool Renovations results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Burden of Proof, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 4.5% saturation with 157 hits. Analysis detected 1,111 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,507 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Reflecting Pool Renovations is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Reflecting Pool Renovations
Topic details
Total words: 3,507
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.5%4.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.6%2.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.2%1.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.3%1.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.7%0.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.7%1.7%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.3%0.3%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 2.3%2.3%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Topic 2.6%2.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.3%Burden of Proof: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.4%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.0%Red Herring: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.7%Circular Reasoning: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.1%Personal Incredulity: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.8%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos