Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video916 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Redistricting Reform results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Politically Left Leaning Bias, and Overconfidence Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 6.3% saturation with 171 hits. Analysis detected 637 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,706 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠42% (9,198 of 15,769 topics). This Redistricting Reform is better (less manipulative) than 58.30% of the peer group.
Redistricting Reform
Topic details
Total words: 2,706
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

42% percentile
025507510041.7% percentile
2.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.3%6.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.5%1.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 2.5%2.5%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 3.8%3.8%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 0.8%0.8%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Topic 0.7%0.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 5.7%5.7%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Topic 1.5%1.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 4.6%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 2.0%Begging the Question: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.4%Indoctrination: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos