Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video511 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Red Card results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Loss Aversion, and Optimism Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9.4% saturation with 192 hits. Analysis detected 1,361 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,044 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠49% (8,500 of 16,558 topics). This Red Card is better (less manipulative) than 51.30% of the peer group.
Red Card
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,044
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

49% percentile
025507510048.7% percentile
2.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.4%9.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.0%5.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.0%2.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.3%0.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.3%0.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.8%4.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 8.9%8.9%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.4%3.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.3%1.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 11.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 3.7%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 5.3%Loss Aversion: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 2.5%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 0.5%Indoctrination: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.3%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Special Pleading: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.3%Begging the Question: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.5%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.6%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.1%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos