Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,304 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Reconciliation Bill results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Framing Effect, and Unattributed Quote, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 20% saturation with 783 hits. Analysis detected 3,404 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,912 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠47% (8,840 of 16,559 topics). This Reconciliation Bill is better (less manipulative) than 53.40% of the peer group.
Reconciliation Bill
Topic details
Total words: 3,912
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

47% percentile
025507510046.6% percentile
2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.1%8.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 9.7%9.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.9%0.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.6%1.6%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.9%4.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.2%1.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.5%0.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.1%0.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 20.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 5.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 0.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 4.6%False Dilemma: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 1.5%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.6%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos