Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,627 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Real Id Act results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Pessimism Bias, and Optimism Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.5% saturation with 709 hits. Analysis detected 6,075 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,881 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠61% (6,470 of 16,562 topics). This Real Id Act is worse (more manipulative) than 60.90% of the peer group.
Real Id Act
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,881
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

61% percentile
025507510060.9% percentile
3.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.8%2.8%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 10.4%10.4%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Topic 7.4%7.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.1%1.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.7%1.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 14.5%14.5%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 6.0%6.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.9%6.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.6%0.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.5%1.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 14.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 13.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 11.1%Pessimism Bias: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 1.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 7.5%Slippery Slope: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 1.7%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.7%False Dilemma: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 1.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.3%, sitewide 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.7%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos