Topic summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,132 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rate Bowl results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Anchoring Bias , Optimism Bias , and Framing Effect , with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 25.3% saturation with 858 hits . Analysis detected 7,178 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,396 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 7% and a BS Rank of 86% (2,306 of 15,576 topics). This Rate Bowl is worse (more manipulative) than 85.20% of the peer group. Rate Bowl
Topic details
Total words: 3,396
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
85% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 85.2% percentile 7.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 24.1% 24.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 25.3% 25.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 20.3% 20.3% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Topic 17.7% 17.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 19.5% 19.5% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Topic 15.2% 15.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 6.8% 6.8% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 20.1% 20.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 5.5% 5.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 20.1%, sitewide 26.9% In-Group Bias: Topic 25.3%, sitewide 6.9% Anchoring Bias: Topic 24.1%, sitewide 4.0% Optimism Bias: Topic 20.3%, sitewide 6.0% Halo Effect: Topic 19.5%, sitewide 6.7% Negativity Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 19.2% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 17.7%, sitewide 3.7% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 13.5%, sitewide 15.9% Recency Bias: Topic 15.2%, sitewide 2.7% Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 7.5% Anecdotal: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.3% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.5% Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.4% Bandwagon: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst