Topic summary
⁠55%1 analyzed article/video1,095 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rare Earth Minerals results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Authority, and Appeal to Emotion, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 14.3% saturation with 626 hits. Analysis detected 4,018 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,380 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠44% (8,872 of 15,689 topics). This Rare Earth Minerals is better (less manipulative) than 56.50% of the peer group.
Rare Earth Minerals
Topic details
Total words: 4,380
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

44% percentile
025507510043.5% percentile
2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.4%2.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 11.3%11.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 14.3%14.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.0%8.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.0%1.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.5%1.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.8%0.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.0%5.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.4%1.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 11.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 14.3%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 6.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 3.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.7%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%Bandwagon: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos