Topic summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 4,851 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ranked results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Halo Effect , and Appeal to Authority , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 15.8% saturation with 2,283 hits . Analysis detected 8,729 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,447 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 10% (15,030 of 16,562 topics). This Ranked is better (less manipulative) than 90.70% of the peer group. Ranked
Topic details
Total words: 14,447
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
9% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 9.3% percentile 1.5% BS Score3 analyzed articles14.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 8.5% 8.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 15.8% 15.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 0.6% 0.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.1% 0.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.4% 4.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.0% 3.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.5% 3.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 15.8%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 6.7% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst