Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,075 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rainwater Collection results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote, Biased Writer Voice, and Appeal to Emotion, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 9.9% saturation with 427 hits. Analysis detected 3,527 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,300 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠45% (9,133 of 16,562 topics). This Rainwater Collection is better (less manipulative) than 55.10% of the peer group.
Rainwater Collection
Topic details
Total words: 4,300
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

45% percentile
025507510044.9% percentile
2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.0%4.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.3%4.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.8%5.8%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 8.2%8.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.5%0.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.7%4.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.7%0.7%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.1%4.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.7%5.7%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 1.0%1.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 9.1%Unattributed Quote: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 1.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Recency Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 0.0%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.1%Appeal to Nature: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.8%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos