Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Railway Safety results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Hindsight Bias, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.3% saturation with 544 hits. Analysis detected 3,689 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,300 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Railway Safety is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Railway Safety
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 5,300
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.9%6.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.5%6.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 10.3%10.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.9%0.9%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Topic 8.3%8.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.3%0.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 7.1%7.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hindsight Bias: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 1.4%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 7.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 7.1%, sitewide 0.8%Halo Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.6%, sitewide 3.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 5.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 2.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.0%False Dilemma: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.5%Recency Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.7%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.6%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos