Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Radical Ideologies results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Genetic Fallacy, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 22.6% saturation with 933 hits. Analysis detected 3,840 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,122 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Radical Ideologies is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Radical Ideologies
Topic details
Total words: 4,122
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.4%2.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.2%1.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 12.0%12.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.4%0.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.9%0.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.1%2.1%Genetic FallacySitewide 1.4%Topic 5.8%5.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 22.6%22.6%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 4.9%4.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 22.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 16.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 12.0%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.7%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 1.4%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 1.4%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.3%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.1%Burden of Proof: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.4%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.5%Straw Man: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.9%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos