Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Radar Detection results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Authority, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 19.4% saturation with 402 hits. Analysis detected 2,094 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,076 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Radar Detection is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Radar Detection
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
⁠0%Radar Detection (selected)0%
Topic details
Total words: 2,076
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.5%8.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.6%0.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 19.4%19.4%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 11.0%11.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.2%2.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.1%2.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.2%3.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.1%1.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 7.7%7.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.7%4.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 26.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 19.4%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 11.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 11.0%, sitewide 0.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 8.1%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 4.6%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 3.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 5.2%False Dilemma: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 1.5%Bandwagon: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 2.2%Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.5%Slippery Slope: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.7%Composition/Division: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos