Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 606 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Racist Texts results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Optimism Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 44% saturation with 800 hits . Analysis detected 2,873 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,818 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.9% and a BS Rank of 89% (1,916 of 16,562 topics). This Racist Texts is worse (more manipulative) than 88.40% of the peer group. Racist Texts
Topic details
Total words: 1,818
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
88% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 88.4% percentile 7.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 44.0% 44.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 15.9% 15.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Topic 10.5% 10.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.1% 3.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 11.6% 11.6% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 30.9% 30.9% Horn Effect Sitewide 1.0% Topic 4.3% 4.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 5.5% 5.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Negativity Bias: Topic 44.0%, sitewide 19.2% Framing Effect: Topic 30.9%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 11.6%, sitewide 15.9% Optimism Bias: Topic 15.9%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 11.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 10.5%, sitewide 3.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 4.0% Horn Effect: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 1.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.3% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.9% Loss Aversion: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.5% Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.4% Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Genetic Fallacy: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.4% Primacy Effect: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst