Topic summary
⁠53%2 analyzed articles/videos818 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Racial Gerrymandering results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Framing Effect, and Ad Hominem, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 12.2% saturation with 524 hits. Analysis detected 4,109 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,278 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠30% (11,175 of 15,878 topics). This Racial Gerrymandering is better (less manipulative) than 70.40% of the peer group.
Racial Gerrymandering
Topic details
Total words: 4,278
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

30% percentile
025507510029.6% percentile
2.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.6%7.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.4%5.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.9%0.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.8%0.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.3%1.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.5%0.5%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.9%3.9%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.2%0.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.3%4.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 12.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.0%Ad Hominem: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 2.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.7%False Dilemma: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 3.1%Slippery Slope: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Begging the Question: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos