Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Queer Representation results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Hasty Generalization, and Appeal to Emotion, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 41% saturation with 1,933 hits. Analysis detected 5,320 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,719 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Queer Representation is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Queer Representation
Topic details
Total words: 4,719
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 41.0%41.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.9%2.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.1%2.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.9%5.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 13.2%13.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.9%3.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.8%2.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.1%0.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 4.0%4.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 41.0%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Topic 13.2%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 3.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Topic 0.0%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.1%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos