Topic summary
⁠44%2 analyzed articles/videos2,020 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Queer History results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Framing Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 9.6% saturation with 772 hits. Analysis detected 6,512 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,080 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠52% (10,981 of 22,457 topics). This Queer History is worse (more manipulative) than 51.10% of the peer group.
Queer History
Topic details
Total words: 8,080
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

51% percentile
025507510051.1% percentile
2.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles8.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.3%7.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.0%8.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.3%8.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.2%1.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.0%2.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.9%2.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 2.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Indoctrination: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos