Topic summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,299 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Quality Of Life results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Hasty Generalization , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.5% saturation with 1,744 hits . Analysis detected 13,030 faulty-reasoning hits from 15,104 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 22% (12,922 of 16,562 topics). This Quality Of Life is better (less manipulative) than 78.00% of the peer group. Quality Of Life
Topic details
Total words: 15,104
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
22% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 22.0% percentile 2.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles15.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 3.9% 3.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.0% 4.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 11.6% 11.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 10.9% 10.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.1% 4.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.6% 3.6% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 11.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 10.9%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.7%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.7%, sitewide 0.8% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.9% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.0%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst