Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video537 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Quality Issues results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Anchoring Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 42.8% saturation with 690 hits. Analysis detected 3,143 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,611 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 8.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠89% (1,822 of 16,562 topics). This Quality Issues is worse (more manipulative) than 89.00% of the peer group.
Quality Issues
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,611
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

89% percentile
025507510089.0% percentile
8.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 42.8%42.8%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 19.9%19.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.9%3.9%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 12.3%12.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 35.0%35.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 16.8%16.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.1%4.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.9%0.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.2%2.2%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 7.1%7.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Topic 42.8%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Topic 35.0%, sitewide 26.9%Anchoring Bias: Topic 19.9%, sitewide 4.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 16.8%, sitewide 9.1%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 15.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 12.3%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 7.5%Recency Bias: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 2.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 6.0%Halo Effect: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.7%Begging the Question: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 1.7%Red Herring: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 0.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 2.5%Composition/Division: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 0.2%Special Pleading: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 0.3%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.3%Horn Effect: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Primacy Effect: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.9%Blind-Spot Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.2%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.4%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos