Topic summary
⁠64%1 analyzed article/video1,020 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Quad Partnership results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias, Slippery Slope, and Optimism Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.1% saturation with 279 hits. Analysis detected 2,573 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,060 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠60% (6,569 of 16,313 topics). This Quad Partnership is worse (more manipulative) than 59.70% of the peer group.
Quad Partnership
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,060
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

60% percentile
025507510059.7% percentile
3.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.0%6.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.1%9.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.4%6.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.2%2.2%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Topic 8.4%8.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.9%2.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.4%3.4%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 5.0%5.0%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 1.3%1.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 6.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 1.7%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 6.0%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 7.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.3%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.1%Recency Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 2.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.6%Begging the Question: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.5%Burden of Proof: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos