Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos362 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pyramid Schemes results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 26.7% saturation with 333 hits. Analysis detected 1,800 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,245 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 5.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠80% (3,344 of 16,562 topics). This Pyramid Schemes is worse (more manipulative) than 79.80% of the peer group.
Pyramid Schemes
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,245
Article count: 2
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

80% percentile
025507510079.8% percentile
5.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles1.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 24.7%24.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 9.5%9.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.7%0.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.0%4.0%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Topic 6.8%6.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 23.3%23.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.0%1.0%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 3.7%3.7%Primacy EffectSitewide 0.9%Topic 4.0%4.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 2.3%2.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 26.8%, sitewide 26.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 24.7%, sitewide 8.1%Negativity Bias: Topic 23.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 6.9%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 1.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 4.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.6%Primacy Effect: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 0.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 0.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 3.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Composition/Division: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.2%Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.7%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos