Topic summary
⁠27%1 analyzed article/video1,311 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Public School Law results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Begging the Question, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 5.8% saturation with 230 hits. Analysis detected 1,672 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,933 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠14% (14,325 of 16,562 topics). This Public School Law is better (less manipulative) than 86.50% of the peer group.
Public School Law
Topic details
Total words: 3,933
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

14% percentile
025507510013.5% percentile
1.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.7%4.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.4%2.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.8%5.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.1%1.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.4%0.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.1%2.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.3%Begging the Question: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.8%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.0%Burden of Proof: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos