Topic summary
⁠8%1 analyzed article/video1,225 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Public Participation results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Authority, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 5.1% saturation with 249 hits. Analysis detected 2,008 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,900 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠7% (15,405 of 16,562 topics). This Public Participation is better (less manipulative) than 93.00% of the peer group.
Public Participation
Topic details
Total words: 4,900
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

7% percentile
02550751007.0% percentile
1.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.2%4.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.7%4.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.1%5.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.9%0.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.8%0.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.6%0.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.0%1.0%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.5%Indoctrination: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos