Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,502 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Public Opinion Polling results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 25.1% saturation with 1,292 hits. Analysis detected 7,671 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,155 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠66% (5,343 of 15,330 topics). This Public Opinion Polling is worse (more manipulative) than 65.20% of the peer group.
Public Opinion Polling
Topic details
Total words: 5,155
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

65% percentile
025507510065.2% percentile
3.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 11.2%11.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 14.9%14.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.6%5.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 15.2%15.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.7%0.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 25.1%25.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.7%2.7%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.1%4.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.3%1.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 11.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 25.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 15.2%, sitewide 5.3%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 14.9%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.7%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.0%Anchoring Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 4.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 4.6%Indoctrination: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 2.7%Slippery Slope: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.0%Bandwagon: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos