Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,383 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Public Opinion On Vaccines results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Negativity Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 12.8% saturation with 707 hits. Analysis detected 4,509 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,532 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠21% (12,582 of 15,914 topics). This Public Opinion On Vaccines is better (less manipulative) than 79.10% of the peer group.
Public Opinion On Vaccines
Topic details
Total words: 5,532
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

21% percentile
025507510020.9% percentile
1.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.7%1.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.8%2.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.9%6.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 12.8%12.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.9%3.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.8%0.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.7%1.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.6%0.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.9%1.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.4%1.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 15.9%Anecdotal: Topic 12.8%, sitewide 5.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 11.2%, sitewide 9.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos