Topic summary
⁠99%1 analyzed article/video554 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Public Interest Litigation results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Availability Heuristic, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 60.6% saturation with 1,007 hits. Analysis detected 4,451 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,662 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 9.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠91% (1,492 of 16,562 topics). This Public Interest Litigation is worse (more manipulative) than 91.00% of the peer group.
Public Interest Litigation
Topic details
Total words: 1,662
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

91% percentile
025507510091.0% percentile
9.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 60.6%60.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 36.6%36.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 21.1%21.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 21.2%21.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 17.3%17.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 19.2%19.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.7%3.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 12.6%12.6%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 8.7%8.7%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 6.7%6.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Negativity Bias: Topic 60.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 36.6%, sitewide 15.9%Framing Effect: Topic 19.2%, sitewide 26.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 21.2%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 21.1%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 17.3%, sitewide 8.1%Anecdotal: Topic 12.6%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 11.1%Pessimism Bias: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 1.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 7.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 2.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 0.0%Burden of Proof: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 0.4%Begging the Question: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 1.7%Recency Bias: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 1.5%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.1%Indoctrination: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.0%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.2%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.5%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.8%Personal Incredulity: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.2%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos