Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Public Health Mandates results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Availability Heuristic, and Appeal to Emotion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 11% saturation with 405 hits. Analysis detected 2,393 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,672 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,558 topics). This Public Health Mandates is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Public Health Mandates
Topic details
Total words: 3,672
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 11.0%11.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.5%6.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.7%4.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.7%1.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.6%1.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.1%5.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.7%0.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 2.8%2.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 11.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 2.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.8%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.2%Burden of Proof: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.4%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.9%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Primacy Effect: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.5%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos