Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video828 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Public Health Impacts results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 24.4% saturation with 807 hits. Analysis detected 4,115 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,312 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.3% and a BS Rank of 71% (4,918 of 16,562 topics). This Public Health Impacts is worse (more manipulative) than 70.30% of the peer group.
Public Health Impacts
Topic details
Total words: 3,312
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

70% percentile
025507510070.3% percentile
4.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.6%4.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 24.4%24.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.1%7.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 11.1%11.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.2%0.2%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 5.7%5.7%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.3%4.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.0%5.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 11.0%11.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 8.3%8.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 24.4%, sitewide 11.1%Negativity Bias: Topic 11.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 11.0%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 8.1%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 4.6%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.0%Indoctrination: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 0.0%Slippery Slope: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 0.0%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 4.0%Begging the Question: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 1.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 1.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos