Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Public Health Crisis results contain 13 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Negativity Bias, and Unattributed Quote, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 14.2% saturation with 119 hits. Analysis detected 605 faulty-reasoning hits from 840 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Public Health Crisis is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Public Health Crisis
Topic details
Total words: 840
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles840 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.6%3.6%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 12.1%12.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.1%9.1%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 8.4%8.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 3.5%3.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 3.6%3.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 14.2%14.2%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 1.3%1.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 5.6%5.6%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 3.7%3.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 14.2%, sitewide 15.9%Indoctrination: Topic 12.1%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 1.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 6.0%Recency Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 2.5%Begging the Question: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.0%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos