Topic summary
68% 1 analyzed article/video 324 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Public Disturbances results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Unattributed Quote , and Quote-first Misdirection , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 19.4% saturation with 189 hits . Analysis detected 762 faulty-reasoning hits from 972 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.1% and a BS Rank of 69% (5,229 of 16,562 topics). This Public Disturbances is worse (more manipulative) than 68.40% of the peer group. Public Disturbances
Topic details
Total words: 972
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
68% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 68.4% percentile 4.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles972 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 6.3% 6.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Topic 6.6% 6.6% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Topic 7.0% 7.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.7% 4.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Topic 6.5% 6.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 10.0% 10.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 19.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.0%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 9.1% Unattributed Quote: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 1.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 2.7% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Red Herring: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.7% Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.5% Indoctrination: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.0% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst