Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video3,859 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Public Defender Shortage results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Appeal to Authority, and Self-Serving Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 17.8% saturation with 2,059 hits. Analysis detected 11,083 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,577 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠37% (10,563 of 16,562 topics). This Public Defender Shortage is better (less manipulative) than 63.80% of the peer group.
Public Defender Shortage
Topic details
Total words: 11,577
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

36% percentile
025507510036.2% percentile
2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles11.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.3%2.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.2%1.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.2%1.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.6%1.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.3%3.3%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 8.2%8.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.3%0.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 12.6%12.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 2.1%2.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.8%2.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 17.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 12.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 9.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 3.7%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.9%, sitewide 3.3%Ad Hominem: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 2.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos