Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Public Benefits Fraud results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, False Dilemma, and Hasty Generalization, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 7.2% saturation with 69 hits. Analysis detected 179 faulty-reasoning hits from 956 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 24,181 topics). This Public Benefits Fraud is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Public Benefits Fraud
Topic details
Total words: 956
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles956 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.2%7.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.8%5.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 4.0%4.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 8.1%False Dilemma: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos