Topic summary
⁠49%2 analyzed articles/videos2,441 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Public Banking results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 8.1% saturation with 593 hits. Analysis detected 5,458 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,323 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠15% (14,140 of 16,562 topics). This Public Banking is better (less manipulative) than 85.40% of the peer group.
Public Banking
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 7,323
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

15% percentile
025507510014.6% percentile
1.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.1%8.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.8%4.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.6%2.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.4%0.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.9%0.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.4%1.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.8%0.8%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 4.6%Status Quo Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 1.5%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.9%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos